ANvidea mobile GPU is the equivalent to a Nvidea GT 630M and a Nvidea desktop graphics card would be a Nvidea GT 640. As scampi said, the AMD radeon 6670 will have similar performance. And an AMD mobile GPU would be performing like an AMD radeon 7750m. Hope some of this helped Comparegraphics card gaming performance in 56 games and in 1080p, 1440p, and 4K at Ultra, High, Medium, and Low quality settings. AMD Radeon R7 370: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti: Compare this to the R9 270, which came originally at a price of $ 179. Meanwhile, the NVIDIA closest equivalent card is the GTX 760 which costs $ 249. CorsairVengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43. SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28. Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $50. G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $363. SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16. Based on 28,561 user benchmarks for the AMD Radeon R7 Graphics and the Nvidia GeForce MX350, we rank them both on effective speed and value for money Asothers have already stated, CUDA can only be directly run on NVIDIA GPUs. As also stated, existing CUDA code could be hipify -ed, which essentially runs a sed script that changes known CUDA API calls to HIP API calls. Then the HIP code can be compiled and run on either NVIDIA (CUDA backend) or AMD (ROCm backend) GPUs. ReallyI'd say there isn't one. At least not a 7 series card. A 660 or 660 Ti would be closeish. As stated above the 750 Ti is slower with the 760 being faster. The R9 270 and 270X are the same with just different clock speeds. You can usually OC a 270 to 270X or higher speeds. The 760 is closer to the R9 280 just a bit slower. R7 260XtZGoeF.